Tag: LifeSprout


LifeSprout Founders Show Development of Soft Tissue Substitute With…

LifeSprout Founders Show Development of Soft Tissue Substitute With Fewer Side Effects

May 3, 2019

The following was originally published in Johns Hopkins Medicine’s Newsroom.

A team of plastic surgeons and material scientists has made an important advance in treating the common clinical problem of soft tissue loss. They have invented a synthetic soft tissue substitute that is well tolerated and encourages the growth of soft tissue and blood vessels. This new material retains its shape without being too dense, overcoming challenges with current tissue fillers that tend to be either too soft or not porous enough to let cells move in and start regrowing tissue. A report on this work was published May 1 in Science Translational Medicine.

“As a plastic surgeon, I see patients every day who lose soft tissue like skin, fat and muscle from cancer surgery, trauma or other conditions. Currently our options are limited to implants, which are plagued by fibrosis and other problems, or ‘borrowing’ tissues from elsewhere in the body, which can cause deformity there as well,” says Sashank Reddy, M.D., Ph.D., an instructor in plastic and reconstructive surgery at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the medical director for Johns Hopkins Technology Ventures.

Two tissue defects were created at each side of the inguinal fat pat. Hydrogels of 80- and 150-Pa, and composite of 150-Pa with the same volume of 1 mL were injected into the defect, respectively. Hydrogels showed transparent whereas composite looked white. At POD 42, hydrogels and composite integrated well with the host tissue. It is hard to differentiate injected materials with the host tissue; even we could identify the material location by suture knots, which were marked after the initial injection (View from top). When lifted up the whole inguinal fat pat, we could identify the injected materials (View from bottom). The composite exhibited the similar shape retention as the 150-Pa hydrogel at POD 42, which was larger than the 80-Pa hydrogel. Scale bar = 10 mm. (Courtesy of Johns Hopkins University and Johns Hopkins Medicine)

“Nature abhors a vacuum, and soft tissue defects can contract, deform and fill in with scar. In order to reconstruct these defects, we often move fat from one part of the body to another with a process called fat grafting. This is not always successful, as typically half of the grafted fat will die after it’s transplanted, and it’s often hard to predict how well these procedures will work out,” says Justin Sacks, M.D., M.B.A., vice chair of clinical operations and an associate professor of plastic and reconstructive surgery at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Several years ago, Reddy and Sacks approached Hai-Quan Mao, Ph.D., about developing a material that could allow them to do fewer invasive surgeries to replace lost soft tissue. They wanted to find a better way to help patients while avoiding some of the risks of surgery.

“This was an interesting problem to tackle from an engineering point of view,” says Mao, a professor of materials science and engineering at the Whiting School of Engineering and biomedical engineering at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the associate director of the Institute for NanoBioTechnology at Johns Hopkins. “Typically a gel-like material that’s porous enough for cells to spread inside is too soft to be able to hold its shape, and a material that is able to retain its shape when placed in the soft tissue defects is conversely too dense for cells to grow into. We really needed to synthesize a new material that is soft and porous yet resilient — almost like fat tissue or Jell-O.”

Reddy, Sacks and Mao are co-founders of LifeSprout LLC, a Johns Hopkins spinoff commercializing the technology. LifeSprout recently moved from FastForward 1812, JHTV’s innovation hub, to manufacturing space in South Baltimore.

Since fat often is used to fill in space during reconstructive surgery procedures, the team started by examining the structure and physical properties of fat. They used real human fat as well as animal fat and measured everything about it — how elastic it is, how viscous and how bouncy. They also examined its microscopic structure, which consists of large cells clustered around a fibrous matrix — the extracellular matrix — that lends shape and stability to fat tissue. Once they had those measurements, they started experimenting. They reasoned that the material needed to be safe and well tolerated, so they started with a so-called hydrogel made of hyaluronic acid, a naturally occurring component of the body’s extracellular matrix. Further, hyaluronic acid is already used in more than 90 percent of commercial cosmetic dermal fillers in the United States. But the hydrogel alone cannot retain its shape while retaining porosity, says Mao; rather it will be deformed too easily at the site of repair in the body. So they added another material to the hydrogel to help give it some stiffness. The research team turned to polycaprolactone (PCL) fibers, the same material used in some resorbable stitches.

“These fibers are about one one-hundredth the diameter of a human hair, but even at that size, we knew we had to limit how much we used. Too much and the resulting material would be too thick to inject through a thin needle,” says Russell Martin, Ph.D., a postdoctoral fellow in materials science and engineering at Johns Hopkins who spearheaded this project. So they broke the fibers into short pieces, mixed them into hydrogel, and through a chemical reaction, caused the fibers to bond with the hydrogel to form what’s called a composite.

In order for the composite to work as hoped, it had to match the stiffness of the surrounding tissue, yet be porous enough for cells in that tissue to move in. So the team first experimented with lab-grown human blood vessel cells and fat stem cells to figure out what kinds of conditions would favor cells to infiltrate into the composite to grow. They compared pure hydrogel with the new composite material, both with similar levels of stiffness. They found that the cells were unable to penetrate pure hydrogel, but not only were the cells able to move into the composite, they also formed networks that looked like blood vessels.

“We found in the composite that the nanofibers were well spread out and created a structure similar to that of fat, so this was really encouraging,” says Reddy. They then tested the composite by injecting it under the skin of rats. Over a period of several weeks, rats injected with the composite developed new blood vessels within the injected composite, whereas rats injected with only hydrogel didn’t show substantial blood vessel formation.

So then the team wanted to mimic a soft tissue repair scenario with the composite to see how well it would work. Using rabbits, they removed 1 cubic centimeter of fat from the flank, then injected that same site with either composite or hydrogel. This volume imitates the individual droplets of fat that are transferred currently in clinical fat grafting. The results mimicked what was seen in the rat experiments with substantially better tissue ingrowth into the composite.

“We are really excited about this material as it provides a good foundation for other types of studies and uses in the future,” says Reddy.

“As an engineer, it’s common for us to invent something, then try to get people to use it. In this case, the need came from the patients and surgeons in the clinic, we took it to the bench and now we are on our way to bringing a solution back to the clinic; we’ve almost gone full circle,” says Mao.

The team hopes to test this composite in patients with soft tissue deficits within a year.

Authors on this paper include Xiaowei Li, Brian Cho, Russell Martin, Michelle Seu, Chi Zhang, Zhengbing Zhou, Ji Suk Choi, Xuesong Jiang, Long Chen, Gurjot Walia, Jerry Yan, Megan Callanan, Huanhuan Liu, Kevin Colbert, Justin Morrissette-McAlmon, Warren Grayson, Reddy, Sacks and Mao, all of Johns Hopkins at the time the research was performed.

This work was supported by the U.S. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS085714), Maryland Stem Cell Research Fund (2018-MSCRFCO-4088), the National Science Foundation (DMR1410240), Coulter Foundation Translational Grant, Cohen Translational Engineering Fund, Louis B. Thalheimer Award for Translational Research, Abell Foundation Translational Award and Maryland Innovation Initiative. Xiaowei Li acknowledges a postdoctoral fellowship from the Maryland Stem Cell Research Fund (2013MSCRF-00042169) and an AHA Career Development Award (18CDA34110314).


LifeSprout’s Growth Leads Company to New Manufacturing Space in…

LifeSprout’s Growth Leads Company to New Manufacturing Space in Baltimore

April 24, 2019

LifeSprout is moving from one Baltimore innovation hub to another as it prepares for clinical trials later this year.

The Johns Hopkins startup, which is developing next-generation synthetic soft tissues for reconstructive and aesthetic surgical procedures, has left FastForward 1812 for LaunchPort in City Garage, a makerspace and incubator in South Baltimore.

The new location has manufacturing space, which LifeSprout will use to make the proprietary components of its technology, according to CEO Eric Goorno, M.B.A.

LifeSprout was formed in 2015 and has been headquartered for the last year at FastForward, near Johns Hopkins’ East Baltimore campus.

LifeSprout’s co-founders, from left: Russell Martin, Hai-Quan Mao, Justin Sacks and Sashank Reddy. (Courtesy of LifeSprout)

“FastForward provided LifeSprout with the ideal location to transition from concept to early prototyping while locking down the fundamental technology,” Goorno says. “Now that we’re at the development and scale-up stage, we’re ready to go to the next step.”

Johns Hopkins researchers founded LifeSprout based on technology developed in the lab of Hai-Quan Mao, Ph.D., associate director of the Johns Hopkins Institute for NanoBioTechnology. More than 3 million patients annually experience soft-tissue loss from developmental disorders, cancer, trauma or aging. Rather than undergoing invasive surgical procedures to replace the tissue, LifeSprout’s injectable product immediately restores soft-tissue volume while promoting regeneration.

Among the company’s founders is Sashank Reddy, M.D., Ph.D., medical director for Johns Hopkins Technology Ventures.

“To be right here at Hopkins was the perfect arrangement for us,” Goorno says of FastForward.

LifeSprout received funding from The Johns Hopkins University’s Cohen Translational Engineering Fund and Louis B. Thalheimer Fund for Translational Research, as well as the Abell Foundation and the Maryland Technology Development Corp. (TEDCO) Maryland Stem Cell Research and Maryland Innovation Initiative (MII) funds.

“LifeSprout is a great example of how many elements of the JHU and Maryland ecosystem can come together to form and nurture a promising venture,” says Brian Stansky, M.S., senior director of FastForward. “With venture funding and the move to purpose-built space at LaunchPort, LifeSprout is poised to take the next steps toward clinical and commercial success.”

LifeSprout maintains a small research space at FastForward to access critical equipment that will ensure consistent testing results in its new space, according to co-founder Russell Martin, M.S., Ph.D., head of research and development.

Martin says he will miss talking with other FastForward tenants who are going through the same startup trials and tribulations. Goorno says the company took advantage of FastForward’s support services, including accounting and shared spaces.

“Having a beautiful facility with all the little details added a lot of credibility when we met with board members and potential investors,” he says. “It’s an easy space to show off.”
LaunchPort is a medical device accelerator run by Bob Storey, a FastForward mentor-in-residence who was LifeSprout’s site miner for its successful MII application. LifeSprout will have its own clean room at its new headquarters as well as more office space. The company recently doubled in size to eight employees with plans to hire more, according to Goorno.

LifeSprout will be one of the initial tenants at LaunchPort, which is aimed at startups working on commercialization of medical technology.

“LaunchPort is the perfect phase two,” says Goorno.

LifeSprout recently closed its seed-series funding, which allowed for preparation for clinical trials. The company now is preparing for its Series A round, money from which will go toward obtaining clearance from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Union.

“It’s an exciting time for us and we’re glad FastForward was a key part of our development,” Goorno says. “It’s been a nice relationship and we’ll want to keep the connection going as long as possible.”

The Baltimore-Washington region is the sixth-ranked life sciences cluster in the nation, according to commercial real estate firm CBRE. The region experienced a ninefold increase in life sciences venture capital funding over the last 18 months, ahead of other top 10 life science markets such as Philadelphia, San Diego and Chicago. Meanwhile, lab vacancy dropped nearly three percentage points to 3.3 percent, according to CBRE, keeping availability tight and rents relatively high.

FastForward offers innovation hubs across Baltimore with turnkey solutions to startups’ space needs, from individual desks to a full Biosafety Level 2 wet lab.

WP-Backgrounds Lite by InoPlugs Web Design and Juwelier Schönmann 1010 Wien